Skip to Content

News

Dan Fleming Secures Major Legal Victory in FELA Case

By JP Firm | Categories: Articles, Blogs, Firm News, LitigationPrint PDF January 2025

Attorney Dan Fleming, alongside colleagues Matt Kochinski and Kevin Tragesser of Johnson Pope, successfully defended a transportation client in a workplace injury case under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA). The Circuit Court for Duval County, Florida, granted summary judgment in favor of the client, dismissing claims of negligence and affirming the importance of workplace safety compliance in such cases.

This result underscores the plaintiff’s own failure to adhere to established safety protocols as the decisive factor in the case. The court determined that the plaintiff’s action—standing prematurely while the locomotive was still moving—was the proximate cause of the injury, absolving the employer of liability.

Key Takeaways
Dan Fleming argued the motion before the Court and relied heavily on the research and drafting of Kochinski and Tragesser. Together, they demonstrated the railroad’s strict adherence to safety protocols and dismantled the speculative nature of the plaintiff’s claims.

The court found no evidence to support the allegations of negligence. Instead, it highlighted the plaintiff’s non-compliance with safety standards as the primary reason for the incident, reinforcing the principle that evidence-based arguments are critical in litigation.

Insights for Future Cases

This case provides a valuable example for attorneys navigating workplace injury claims:

  • Safety Documentation is Crucial: Employers must maintain clear and comprehensive records of safety policies, employee training, and any prior violations. Such documentation is instrumental in countering allegations of negligence.
  • Establishing Proximate Cause: Plaintiffs must demonstrate a direct link between employer negligence and their injuries. This ruling reaffirms the importance of causation as a foundational element of FELA claims.
  • Pattern Evidence Matters: Highlighting the plaintiff’s history of safety violations can shift focus toward contributory negligence, a key factor in defending workplace injury cases.
  • Speculation Won’t Stand: Claims relying on conjecture or unsupported expert testimony are unlikely to succeed. Attorneys must be prepared to scrutinize and challenge such arguments effectively.

    Why This Victory Stands Out

    This decision reflects Johnson Pope’s commitment to providing exceptional legal representation. It also serves as a precedent for the transportation industry, emphasizing that compliance with safety protocols protects both employers and employees while reinforcing the need for sound legal strategies.
    The teamwork demonstrated in this case was essential to achieving such a positive outcome. Dan Fleming’s courtroom advocacy, combined with the contributions of Matt Kochinski and Kevin Tragesser, exemplifies the collaborative effort required to navigate complex litigation successfully.

    As a firm, we are proud to have delivered this result for our client and look forward to applying these lessons in future cases to protect the interests of those we represent.

    Connect with Our Litigation Team
    If your organization needs strategic and results-driven legal representation, our litigation team is here to help. Reach out today to discuss how we can assist with your legal needs.

    Learn More from Our Litigation Experts
    Discover more insights, case studies, and updates from our litigation team by exploring our latest news and articles. Stay informed and see how we’ve helped clients navigate complex legal challenges.


  • Back
    to Top

    View More Results