During a health care emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses and individuals will face a number of unprecedented legal issues. Johnson Pope’s COVID-19 Task Force is a multi-disciplinary team of lawyers assembled from all of the firm’s offices. We are prepared to help clients address the legal issues likely to arise, or that have already risen, as a result of COVID-19. As the world monitors and attempts to address these incredibly challenging circumstances, being prepared to face inevitable legal issues makes good business sense. Task Force areas of concentration include:
Contract and Transactional issues
Bankruptcy and Creditor’s Rights
Tax & Estate Planning
Government Loans for Small Businesses
As Florida contends with the impact of COVID-19 coronavirus, the safety of our clients and employees is our central concern. We are coordinating our local response, taking into account guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other health organizations to determine the appropriate course of action as it relates to business operations. As of now, our offices remain open. Should the status of our offices change, Johnson Pope has robust and tested technology in place to ensure that we remain available to serve you. We have already implemented flexible working arrangements, and many of our employees are being encouraged to work from home. The entire Johnson Pope team has remote access to all client files, allowing them to securely access all information necessary to serve you. Please do not hesitate to contact any of us via phone or email. We are working as usual, and are here for our clients and our community during this difficult time.
Over the past several days, the reaction to the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, has changed dramatically and at an exponential rate as we learn more information about the virus. We have seen a National State of Emergency declared by President Trump on Friday, March 13, 2020, and a call from health experts to engage in social distancing to slow the spread of the virus. Schools across the country have been cancelled for two weeks or more and places of social gathering, sports and entertainment venues, such as Disney World, have closed. Because this is an unprecedented pandemic situation, we cannot anticipate all the workplace scenarios you may experience, but this summary should give you some initial legal guidance and additional resources to help answer your potential questions. As we confront new challenges arising from the impact of coronavirus, we stand ready to support you and provide counsel to address the specific labor and employment law issues you may encounter.
What is the Families First Coronavirus Response Act?
Update: The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) was passed into law on March 18, 2020 and becomes effective April 1, 2020. We encourage you to read our most recent articles on the FFCRA and other COVID-19 related issues on the Johnson Pope COVID-19 Task Force News website.
On Friday, March 13, 2020, the United States House of Representatives passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (the “Bill”), which could potentially provide free screening, paid leave and enhanced unemployment insurance benefits for people affected by COVID-19. The text of the Bill was released on Saturday, March 14, 2020, and must still be approved by the Senate and signed by President Trump. While certain provisions may change, the Bill proposes to amend the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) on an emergency basis to provide employees of employers with fewer than 500 employees and government employers, who have been on the job for at least 30 days (regardless of whether the employees are within a 75 mile radius), with the right to take up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave under the FMLA to be used for any of the following reasons:
To adhere to a requirement or recommendation to quarantine due to exposure to or symptoms of coronavirus;
To care for an at-risk family member who is adhering to a requirement or recommendation to quarantine due to exposure to or symptoms of coronavirus; and/or
To care for a child of an employee if the child’s school or place of care has been closed, or the child care provider is unavailable, due to coronavirus.
The Bill also requires that employers with fewer than 500 employees and government employers provide employees with two weeks (80 hours) of paid sick leave, paid at the employee’s regular rate, to quarantine or seek a diagnosis or preventive care for coronavirus; or paid at two-thirds the employee’s regular rate to care for a family member for such purposes or to care for a child whose school has closed, or whose child care provider is unavailable, due to the coronavirus. After the two weeks of paid leave, qualified employees are entitled to receive from their employers two-thirds of the employee’s usual pay for the remainder of their 12-week, job-protected leave. Additionally, an employer may not require an employee to use other employer paid leave before the employee uses the leave provided by the Bill.
We will update you on any changes to the final legislation that may occur and guidelines for implementing these emergency procedures.
What other laws impact employers when making decisions about COVID-19?
Employers must also consider the implications of other federal, state and local laws, including the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”), among others, when addressing coronavirus in the workplace. In addition, employers should regularly check the CDC’s Interim Guidance for Business and Employers for recommended business practices and procedures.
Does an employer have to allow employees to work from home?
if an employee has a disability, such as an auto-immune disease that makes the employee at higher risk of complications from COVID-19, or a mental health issue, such as obsessive compulsive disorder that is exacerbated by COVID-19, then the ADA, as well as state and local laws, may require that the employee be allowed to work from home as a reasonable accommodation even if the employee is not subject to a quarantine recommendation.If working from home presents an undue hardship or is otherwise not possible, then the employer should engage in the interactive process to determine whether another reasonable accommodation exists.
In addition to considering a reasonable accommodation, should an employer institute a general work from home policy?
This will depend largely on the employer’s type of business and workforce. In making this determination, the employer should assess its system infrastructure, privacy protocols, and payroll practices. A work from home policy, however, may help control infection amongst employees, customers and vendors and may be soon be mandated by governmental restrictions.
If an employer does allow employees to work from home, the policy should be applied in an equal manner to all employees. For example, if an employer allows older workers to work from home, but requires younger workers to come into the office, the FCRA may be violated as it prohibits age discrimination of not only workers 40 and over, but also of younger workers. Similarly, allowing only women to work from home due to childcare needs, may be discriminatory against men.
In addition, if an employer decides to make a reasonable accommodation for an employee or allow employees to work from home, we recommend providing a written statement to the employees that not only sets forth the work/performance/productivity expectations but also states that 1) the ability to work from home is based solely upon the extraordinary events related to COVID-19 pandemic, 2) the work from home arrangement is temporary, 3) the work from home arrangement will be regularly evaluated based upon guidance from the CDC and other government agencies, and 4) attendance at your business’ location is an essential function of the job which is being temporarily waived due to the COVID-19 pandemic and national state of emergency.
Can an employer take an employee’s temperature or send them home if they appear sick?
Update: On March 21, 2020, the EEOC updated its guidance on the Americans with Disabilities Act and COVID-19. The EEOC has determined that COVID-19 meets the direct threat standard as the CDC and public health authorities have acknowledged community spread of COVID-19 in and have issued precautions to slow the spread, such as significant restrictions on public gatherings. Based upon these facts, the EEOC finds that a significant risk of substantial harm would be posed by having someone with COVID-19, or symptoms of it, present in the workplace at the current time. Due to COVID-19 being classified as a direct threat, employers may now take an employee’s body temperature to determine whether they have a fever. Employers may also ask employees who report feeling ill at work, or who call in sick, questions about their symptoms to determine if they have or may have COVID-19. As with all medical information, the employee’s body temperature and other COVID-19 symptoms must be kept confidential.
An employer cannot make disability related inquiries or require a medical examination if the inquiry is not 1) job-related or 2) consistent with business necessity. Taking an employee’s temperature is a medical examination under the ADA and therefore should not be performed by an employer unless the CDC issues guidance to the contrary as these rules evolve.
An employer also may not poll employees about health conditions to anticipate potential absenteeism. An employer may ask about specific cold or flu symptoms, however, such as whether the employee has a fever or chills. Furthermore, any employee that exhibits COVID-19 like symptoms may be sent home. Please note that any health information that is obtained from an employee, including testing positive for COVID-19, must be kept confidential and separate from the employee’s personnel file.
Do employers have to allow employees to wear face masks if they request to wear one?
Generally, an employer does not have to allow an employee to wear a respirator or face mask when OSHA and CDC guidelines, such as those for healthcare workers, do not require it. In addition, health officials have indicated that that wearing masks, when not required, may create a false sense of security among the general public and are not the best defense against COVID-19. However, if wearing a mask or respirator would be a reasonable accommodation for an employee’s disability, then the employer should allow it.
What are an employer’s obligations to pay an employee if the employee is out due to COVID-19?
If the Bill passes, then employers will be required to pay employees in accordance with the provisions of the Bill as described above. Until the Bill is passed, employers should follow their usual paid time off/sick leave policies. Employers, however, are not prohibited from offering more generous paid time off during the pandemic in order to encourage sick employees or employees who have been exposed to COVID-19 to stay home. If an employer decides to offer greater paid time off due to COVID-19, the policy should be communicated in writing to the employees, including that the change is temporary due to the circumstances.
What are an employer’s obligations under the FLSA if employees work from home?
Under the FLSA, all hourly employees must be paid for all hours worked regardless of whether the work is performed at home or in the office. Breaks of thirty minutes or more can remain uncompensated as long as the employee is completely relieved of duty. Make sure to remind employees that all work time must be reported and there is no “working off the clock”. Salaried exempt employees must be paid their full salaries in any week in which they perform work regardless of the number of hours worked or the number of days worked. The DOL has created resources for employers on these wage and hour issues COVID-19 or Other Public Health Emergencies and the Fair Labor Standards Act Questions and Answers and the WHD Opinion Letter FLSA 2005-41 concerning payment of salaried exempt employees.
Employers may also have a legal obligation to continue to pay employees under the terms of an employment contract or a collective bargaining agreement.
Do employers have any special obligations under OSHA?
During a pandemic, the scope of an employer’s obligations under the OSHA general duty clause depends on the particular circumstances. For example, a medical provider may have higher obligations to protect its employees than a typical office environment. However, an employer’s failure to take appropriate action may form the basis of a general duty clause violation where either 1) the risk of transmission is likely or 2) when the pandemic virus has been detected in the workplace.
Regardless of industry or work environment, OSHA and the CDC urges all employers to protect their workers from occupation exposure during a pandemic outbreak by encouraging employees to 1) stay home if they are sick, 2) regularly wash their hands and take proper hygienic measures, 3) avoid shaking hands, and 4) avoid close contact with coworkers, among other steps recommended by the CDC.
In light of these OSHA requirements, we recommend that employers develop and implement a pandemic preparedness plan. This plan may include incorporating information from federal, state and local health sources, preparing to work with a reduced schedule, and minimizing exposure to employees or the public.
What should an employer do if an employee is diagnosed with COVID-19?
An employer should immediately remove the employee from the worksite or office and take the necessary steps to notify coworkers who may have been in contact with the employee, while not specifically identifying the individual who tested positive.
In addition, OSHA has recently determined that COVID-19 can be a recordable illness if a worker is infected as a result of performing their work-related duties. Employers are only responsible for recording cases of COVID-19, however, if all of the following conditions are met:
The case is a confirmed case of COVID-19;
The case is work-related; and
The case involves one or more of the general recording criteria set forth under OSHA (e.g. medical treatment beyond first-aid, days away from work).
Can an employer require an employee to present a fitness-for-duty to return to work after being diagnosed with COVID-19?
Update: The CDC now recommends that individuals who have COVID-19 and have not received a test, only leave their home after 1) the individual has had no fever for at least 72 hours (3 full days of no fever without the use of medicine that reduces fever) 2) other symptoms, such as cough and shortness of breath, have improved, and 3) at least 7 days have passed since the first symptoms appeared. If the individual has received a positive test for COVID-19, then the individual can leave the home after 1) the individual has no fever without the use of medicine that reduces fever, 2) other symptoms have improved, and 3) the individual has received two negative tests in a row, 24 hours apart.
Employers should be mindful that two negative tests are currently necessary to be considered clear of COVID-19. Although it is not illegal to require such medical clearance, the CDC currently recommends that employers not require a healthcare provider’s note for employees who are sick with acute respiratory illness to validate their illness or to return to work, as healthcare provider offices and medical facilities may be extremely busy and unable to provide such documentation in a timely way. Rather, the CDC recommends that employees suffering from acute respiratory issues not come to work until they are free of fever (100.4° F or greater using an oral thermometer), signs of a fever, and any other symptoms for at least 24 hours, without the use of fever-reducing or other symptom-altering medicines (e.g. cough suppressants).
THIS ARTICLE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED LEGAL ADVICE. LEGAL ADVICE CANNOT BE GIVEN WITHOUT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR SPECIFIC SITUATION.
Dan is a veteran trial lawyer who has been board certified as a specialist in civil trial law by the Florida Bar for over 15 years. During that time, he has enjoyed an AV Preeminent™ rating from Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings and has successfully defended clients in both State and Federal courts throughout the state of Florida. Over the last 25 years, Dan has tried cases in Tampa, Orlando, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Miami, and several other rural jurisdictions throughout Florida. He has obtained defense verdicts on behalf of his clients in a variety of cases including those involving wrongful death, catastrophic injury, allegedly defective products, slip and fall cases, repetitive trauma, breach of contract and allegedly defective workplace conditions. His practice concentrates on civil defense with particular emphasis on railroad, amusement park, pharmacy and trucking accident cases.
In addition to trying cases, Mr. Fleming has extensive appellate experience and has argued appeals on behalf of his clients before four of the five District Courts of Appeal for the State of Florida, the Florida Supreme Court, and the United States Court of Appeal for the 11th Circuit.
Dan is a partner in Johnson Pope’s Tampa office.
Professional Associations & Memberships
Hillsborough County Bar Association
Jesuit Alumni Bar Association
National Association of Railroad Trial Counsel
Awards & Recognitions
AV Preeminent™, Martindale Hubbell
YMCA Youth Sports Coach 1999-2008
American Coaches Association 2004-2014
Christ the King Catholic Church
Palma Ceia Golf and Country Club
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida
U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit
Washington & Jefferson College, B.A. (1987)
Pi Sigma Alpha (Political Science Honors Society)
University of Florida Levin College of Law, J.D. (1990)
Over the past four and one-half decades, Johnson Pope has been committed to helping our clients seize opportunities and solve problems in a high quality, timely and economical manner.
We have some of the best and brightest attorneys in the Tampa Bay Area. Our firm and our lawyers regularly receive awards attesting to our capabilities and results obtained for our clients. We are the only law firm on Florida’s West Coast with full service offices in all three major cities in the Bay Area — Tampa, St. Petersburg and Clearwater.
I invite you to scroll through this website. You will see the wide variety of legal work we do, and the high quality of achievement, advanced degrees and Bar-approved specialty designations held by our lawyers.
If you would like to discuss how we can help you or your business, please call me or any of our lawyers. We look forward to hearing from you.
Very truly yours,
Guy M. Burns
Tampa Office401 East Jackson Street,Suite 3100Tampa, FL 33602